Re: smInvalidQuery in smDefs.idl

["R. Jeff Porter" <rjporter@lbl.gov>]

I don't have any objections to this.  Making the change in the QueryObject
will be a bit tedious but not difficult.

Jeff


>Just wanted to say that smInvalidQuery originally was placed in qe.idl,
>but we wanted to have one exception class for all SM components and
>since CORBA doesn't allow inheritance of exceptions (as far as I know),
>we moved smInvalidQuery from qe.idl to smDefs.idl and renamed it
>smQueryException.
>
>This impacts people using smInvalidQuery (Jeff, more?). Others don't
>have to pick up smDefs.idl just for this reason.
>
> - Henrik
>
>Alex Sim wrote:
>> 
>> Hi there,
>> I propose a class name change for smInvalidQuery in smDefs.idl
>> which makes more sense to smQueryException.
>> It'll impact anyone using smDefs.idl from the Storage Management
>> module. Anyone has any problems on this?
> 
>___________________________________________________________
>Henrik Nordberg <HNordberg@lbl.gov> http://nordberg.lbl.gov
>Scientific Data Management Research Group
>Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
>